Nikon D750 Review
For my first gear review it seemed fitting to review the camera that persuaded me switch from Canon to Nikon. A lot of people ask me why I switched systems. Canon has developed incredible cameras for a long time, I particularly miss Canon color rendering and their outstanding lenses. However they lack in some departments that are very important to my natural light photography style. The two main reasons I switched to Nikon is that Canon camera sensors do not handle shadow recovery very well (digital noise is quite prevalent when underexposing frames) and the dynamic range always leaves something to be desired. My Canon 6D had much better dynamic range then my Canon 5d Mark iii. However both fall short to the D750 and most Nikon bodies.
**Actual images of the D750 were shot with the Nikon D750 and Sigma 35mm 1.4 ART
The Nikon D750 is a 24 megapixel full frame pro-sumer camera that offers an incredible amount of creative options but also has several noticeable flaws. Almost all of the images on my site have been shot with the D750.
Why I love the D750:
1. The flip out LCD screen is a game changer. Composing and exposing in real time on a flip out screen is huge. I rarely, if ever, expose using metering through my eyepiece. I almost always turn on live view, flip out the LCD screen, and expose accordingly. ***the LCD screen will not change exposure in real time out of the box. You have turn the option on through an LCD screen menu, which is odd.
Being able to see your bokeh and composition in real time is just an overall enjoyable experience. Most of the effects you see in my photos are achieved while using live view. I do however miss my focus sometimes and AF is not as precise. I usually manually focus but still can miss if I don’t zoom in on my subjects prior to taking photos. Which is my fault, not the cameras.
2. The Sensor. The sensor recovers shadows like a champ. The sensor has great dynamic range and good color rendering. You can comfortably shoot at high ISO’s and not experience distracting noise. It’s no Sony, but it’s still great. The sensor will allow you to save some photos where you didn’t have time to probably expose a scene. ***If you majorly overexpose you may struggle getting rid of excessive highlights. It’s much, much better at recovering an image that is underexposed.
Raw Image shot with Nikon D750 and Nikor 58mm 1.4
Edited Image
Raw Image shot with Nikon D750 and Nikor 58mm 1.4
Edited Image
3. The dual SD card slot. You can double write raw files, if you are worried about potential corruption. I’ve never had an SD card corrupt. But if you are using third party SD cards it’s a nice fail safe.
4. Battery life. Battery life rocks. If you have a grip (I don’t) you can shoot a whole wedding without every worrying about your camera dying.
5. It’s reliable. I’ve heard some people say they have had reliability issues with the D750 shutter firing correctly or writing images correctly. I’ve never had a single issue.
6. Autofocus is solid. I honestly am not sure on how many autofocus points it has but it hits it’s target quite often. It also allows for continuous AF tracking on a 3D plane. Meaning it will track a subject as they adjust their depth to you. It works great for me during weddings when a lot of people are moving around and I’m only trying to track one subject.
Shot with Nikon D750 and Nikor 58mm 1.4
7. Good video quality. It actually takes excellent video for a DSLR and can shoot 60fps at 1080p. Once again it’s no sony. But the D750 is made for still photography, so if you occasionally need to shoot some video it will suffice quite well. No noticeable moire and having the flip out LCD screen when shooting video is so, so nice. I shot this for my band with a D750. WATCH VIDEO HERE
Why the D750 isn't the best:
1. Max shutter is only 1/4000, pro cameras are at least 1/8000, thus why this is a pro-sumer camera. Why this limitation exists is beyond me. I did read that it is Nikons attempt to distinguish their pro lineup cameras from the D750. I typically shoot at f 2.0 or lower, so during a wedding in the middle of the day outside I usually have to stop up a bit because I can’t shoot faster then 1/4000.
2. The image buffer. When shooting in burst mode with even the fastest SD card the camera will buffer out pretty quickly. I usually stick with the cL setting and not cH. I can last longer shooting in low speed continuos versus high speed.
3. No live view double exposure. This is where Canon bodies rocked. You can take a photo in live view, and it will allow you to take your next photo in live view and see how your double exposure will turn out. With the D750 you have to take it through the eyepiece and basically guess. I don’t think I’ve ever taken a successful double exposure with the D750. I also do not have an eye for double exposures in general.
4. It isn’t weather sealed. I wouldn’t go out and shoot in the rain with it. This is where the Canon 5d mark iii and L series lenses rock. They are weather sealed, which gives you an extra peace of mind when shooting in rough conditions.
Shot with Nikon D750 and Nikor 20mm 1.8
RECCOMENDATION:
Should you buy it? Are you looking to spend $1,500-$2,000 on a still photography camera body? Then yes, you should. Then sell all of your zoom lenses (except your 70-200). Then buy a 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 lens + other prime lenses. Then have fun.
Comments
What Does Stonk Revenue Actually Mean?
======================================
A useful starting point
What Does Stonk Revenue Actually Mean? is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk revenue or stronkfun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Revenue terminology needs discipline. Trading volume is the notional amount exchanged; fees are charges associated with that activity; protocol revenue is the part attributed to the platform under a particular accounting method. Creator earnings and holder distributions may be additional, distinct categories.
Consider what would falsify a bold claim about headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. An onchain transfer, a published fee schedule or a consistently observed market event might confirm one narrow statement while leaving the larger conclusion unresolved. That is why reliable educational coverage uses precise language such as “may,” “depends on,” and “subject to current terms” where certainty is not justified.
It is also useful to maintain a small research log: note the date, the trading pair, the token mint, the source of any fee estimate and the liquidity conditions observed. With that information, subsequent changes are easier to explain. Without it, yesterday’s screenshot may be mistaken for today’s applicable terms.
In practice
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Buybacks and burns are sometimes described as a flywheel, but that metaphor should not hide the moving pieces. One needs to know which fee streams are eligible, which transactions actually occurred, which tokens were purchased, and whether burned supply can be independently verified.
A final practical point is terminology. stronkfun can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
What to check
To understand what does stonk revenue actually mean?, begin with headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. An onchain ledger makes it possible to inspect transactions, but the interpretation still matters. Dashboards may differ in definitions, asset pricing, indexing coverage and the treatment of recipient payouts. A credible analysis explains these limitations before making comparisons.
Take a hypothetical example related to how fee income differs from turnover and valuation: two traders see the same coin at a given moment, but one plans a small test trade while the other intends a much larger order. The second trader may receive a materially different effective price if liquidity is limited. This illustrates why a market label, an attractive theme and a quoted price do not describe the entire trading experience.
The surrounding Solana environment also affects how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. Network transaction fees, execution routes, the behavior of the quote asset and pool depth may all influence the result a wallet user experiences. Even when the application interface makes the process feel simple, the transaction remains part of an open and sometimes volatile market.
The bigger picture
For a grounded assessment, Fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. At the same time, headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. A search for stonk funb may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
======================================
A useful starting point
What Does Stonk Revenue Actually Mean? is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk revenue or stronkfun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Revenue terminology needs discipline. Trading volume is the notional amount exchanged; fees are charges associated with that activity; protocol revenue is the part attributed to the platform under a particular accounting method. Creator earnings and holder distributions may be additional, distinct categories.
Consider what would falsify a bold claim about headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. An onchain transfer, a published fee schedule or a consistently observed market event might confirm one narrow statement while leaving the larger conclusion unresolved. That is why reliable educational coverage uses precise language such as “may,” “depends on,” and “subject to current terms” where certainty is not justified.
It is also useful to maintain a small research log: note the date, the trading pair, the token mint, the source of any fee estimate and the liquidity conditions observed. With that information, subsequent changes are easier to explain. Without it, yesterday’s screenshot may be mistaken for today’s applicable terms.
In practice
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Buybacks and burns are sometimes described as a flywheel, but that metaphor should not hide the moving pieces. One needs to know which fee streams are eligible, which transactions actually occurred, which tokens were purchased, and whether burned supply can be independently verified.
A final practical point is terminology. stronkfun can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
What to check
To understand what does stonk revenue actually mean?, begin with headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. An onchain ledger makes it possible to inspect transactions, but the interpretation still matters. Dashboards may differ in definitions, asset pricing, indexing coverage and the treatment of recipient payouts. A credible analysis explains these limitations before making comparisons.
Take a hypothetical example related to how fee income differs from turnover and valuation: two traders see the same coin at a given moment, but one plans a small test trade while the other intends a much larger order. The second trader may receive a materially different effective price if liquidity is limited. This illustrates why a market label, an attractive theme and a quoted price do not describe the entire trading experience.
The surrounding Solana environment also affects how fee income differs from turnover and valuation. Network transaction fees, execution routes, the behavior of the quote asset and pool depth may all influence the result a wallet user experiences. Even when the application interface makes the process feel simple, the transaction remains part of an open and sometimes volatile market.
The bigger picture
For a grounded assessment, Fees can be collected on trades but the amount assigned to various recipients depends on mechanism. At the same time, headline revenue numbers should include source, period and definitions. A search for stonk funb may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
How to Build a Neutral StonkFun Watchlist
=========================================
The central idea
How to Build a Neutral StonkFun Watchlist is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on which fields help organize research without predicting prices. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonckfun or stonks fun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is which fields help organize research without predicting prices. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. A practical comparison should focus on user-visible mechanisms: which quote tokens are supported, how markets launch, what fees apply, and what happens when initial liquidity moves to a different stage. Brand popularity alone is too narrow a basis for choosing a tool.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
How the mechanics connect
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Tokenized stocks are a particularly easy topic to misunderstand. A coin quoted in a token linked to an equity is still a separate crypto asset. The legal rights and redemption rules of the quote product require independent analysis, and a trading pair does not confer ordinary shareholder rights.
A final practical point is terminology. stonks fun can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
Where confusion arises
To understand how to build a neutral stonkfun watchlist, begin with rankings should be updated as data changes. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Safety analysis should include realistic execution conditions. A small headline market capitalization may look attractive, yet it can coexist with a thin pool where even moderate selling causes large slippage. Liquidity can disappear quickly during market stress.
A sensible conclusion
For a grounded assessment, Record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. At the same time, rankings should be updated as data changes. A search for stonk xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
=========================================
The central idea
How to Build a Neutral StonkFun Watchlist is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on which fields help organize research without predicting prices. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonckfun or stonks fun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is which fields help organize research without predicting prices. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. A practical comparison should focus on user-visible mechanisms: which quote tokens are supported, how markets launch, what fees apply, and what happens when initial liquidity moves to a different stage. Brand popularity alone is too narrow a basis for choosing a tool.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
How the mechanics connect
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Tokenized stocks are a particularly easy topic to misunderstand. A coin quoted in a token linked to an equity is still a separate crypto asset. The legal rights and redemption rules of the quote product require independent analysis, and a trading pair does not confer ordinary shareholder rights.
A final practical point is terminology. stonks fun can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
Where confusion arises
To understand how to build a neutral stonkfun watchlist, begin with rankings should be updated as data changes. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Safety analysis should include realistic execution conditions. A small headline market capitalization may look attractive, yet it can coexist with a thin pool where even moderate selling causes large slippage. Liquidity can disappear quickly during market stress.
A sensible conclusion
For a grounded assessment, Record pair, launch time, liquidity and verifiable trading history. At the same time, rankings should be updated as data changes. A search for stonk xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
No comments posted.
Loading...
© Corey Gross Photography
